Add PowerOn Code Formatter
I think everyone would agree we should probably have support for this - I know a few people have talked about it.
I think everyone would agree we should probably have support for this - I know a few people have talked about it.
Comments4
Jan 30
PinnedThis is now available in
v1.6sorry for the wait.We’ve marked it as experimental because we could only really test on the dataset our VIP environment had ~1300 PowerOns. There may be edge cases which need to be identified and fixed - we’ll need your help to make this happen so please submit a feedback post & give a reproducible case so we can get them patched as quickly as they come in.
Note: Multi-lined comments are kind of strange, so please feel free to give us more examples & preference so we can mature.
Nov 6, 2025
PinnedWe’re getting close ;)
Dylan Martinez
Jan 12
We have good coverage of the ASTs required to make this work. We’re now looking at integrating with PowerOn Pro and will likely publish later this week.
Dylan Martinez
Apr 16, 2025
We will build this - it will take a good amount of time though (just want to set the expectation). We have to extend our current interpreter into something official with total accuracy - we can’t have an opinionated formatter change the function of any existing code & possibly cause regression.
Hopefully that makes sense. Also, with the amount of time we’ll have to sink into this it’s going to be something either behind the
Plussubscription for PowerOn Pro or available independently. Either way, it will get built due to the community interest - I don’t have an ETA to share at this time.